Bill Johnson
Mike White and
Glenn Nice

Glyphosate and Foliar Fertilizers
Created: 4/13/2010     www.btny.purdue.edu/weedscience
 

Manganese deficiency is occasionally observed in soybean grown in northern Indiana. Because Mn deficiency symptoms frequently appear near the time of postemergence glyphosate applications in glyphosate-resistant soybean, producers and custom applicators occasionally tank-mix glyphosate and foliar Mn fertilizer to reduce application costs. Research has shown that glyphosate efficacy is antagonized when it is tank-mixed with some Mn fertilizers and Mn-EDTA appears to be the least antagonistic of the Mn fertilizers.

We conducted a greenhouse study to evaluate the effect of a couple of Mn fertilizers on glyphosate efficacy on velvetleaf and common waterhemp, two weeds which have shown variable tolerance to glyphosate. To conduct this study, we planted velvetleaf and waterhemp seeds in Styrofoam cups and allowed the weeds to grow to 4 to 6 inches in height. The treatments were applied with a greenhouse track sprayer calibrated to deliver 15 GPA.  The glyphosate rate used was 11 oz/A or about ½ of the normal labeled rate. We used a low rate in an attempt to exaggerate the differences that can occur when spray conditions in the field are less than idea (i.e. big weeds, drought conditions). The treatments were applied in either de-ionized water or in well water. The well water is considered hard water with significant concentrations of calcium and iron in it.  The Mn fertilizer solutions consisted of 6% Mn Sulfate applied at 32 oz/A and 6% Mn EDTA applied at 36 oz/A.

Figure 1 shows that hard water will reduce the ability of glyphosate to control of velvetleaf and waterhemp. Hard water reduced glyphosate efficacy on velvetleaf at least 20% at 1 and 4 weeks after treatment. Hard water reduced glyphosate efficacy on waterhemp 50% at 1 WAT and 30% at 4 WAT.

 
 
Figure 1. Velvetleaf and Waterhemp Control in Deionized vs Well Water.
 
 

Figure 2 shows the effect of Mn fertilizers on glyphosate efficacy in deionized water. A reduction in efficacy was also noted when Mn sulfate and Mn EDTA were tankmixed with glyphosate in de-ionized water (Figure 2). Velvetleaf control was reduced at least 20% by the fertilizers and waterhemp control was reduced at least 30% by the fertilizers.

 
 
Figure 2. Velvetleaf and Waterhemp Control with Glyphosate + Foliar Fertilizers in Deionized Water.
 
 

Figure 3 shows the effect of Mn fertilizers on glyphosate efficacy in hard water.  A slight reduction in efficacy on velvetleaf by foliar fertilizers was noted when treatments were applied in well water (Figure 3).  On waterhemp, Mn sulfate reduced glyphosate efficacy at 1 and 4 WAT. Mn EDTA did not reduce glyphosate efficacy at 1 WAT, but did reduce glyphosate efficacy at 4 WAT. The antagonistic effect of the Mn fertilizers was less, but overall control was lower to start with.

 
 
Figure 3. Velvetleaf and Waterhemp Control with Glyphosate + Foliar Fertilizers in Well Water.
 
 
Take Home Points:  
1. Hard water can have a dramatic effect on herbicide activity. Remember to add ammonium sulfate to the tank before herbicides are added to reduce the effect of hard water cations on glyphosate efficacy.
2. Mn EDTA is less antagonistic to glyphosate than Mn sulfate. However, both can reduce glyphosate efficacy on velvetleaf and waterhemp.
 

 

 

 
It is the policy of the Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service that all persons have equal opportunity and access to its educational programs, services, activities, and facilities without regard to race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin or ancestry, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, disability or status as a veteran. Purdue University is an Affirmative Action institution. This material may be available in alternative formats.
1-888-EXT-INFO
http://www.ces.purdue.edu/new
 
         
Information listed here is based on research and outreach extension programming at Purdue University and elsewhere. The use of trade names is for clarity to readers of this site, does not imply endorsement of a particular brand nor does exclusion imply non-approval. Always consult the herbicide label for the most current and update precautions and restrictions. Copies, reproductions, or transcriptions of this document or its information must bear the statement ‘Produced and prepared by Purdue University Extension Weed Science’ unless approval is given by the author.